8 February 2021

Watch out with the trial day: a permanent contract could be lurking!

Stelt u zich eens voor: u werkt al jaren met dezelfde zelfstandige. Hij stuurt facturen, factureert btw en heeft een eigen kvk-nummer. Toch krijgt u in 2026 ineens vragen van de Belastingdienst over de aard van uw samenwerking. Hoe heeft het zo ver kunnen komen?

Within 36 months, you may agree three fixed-term employment contracts with your employee. In most cases it is clear how many employment contracts you have agreed so far. The start date and end date are usually clearly stated in the contract. But what if you once had an employee do a trial run before the first employment contract starts? The court has ruled that this trial day sometimes counts as the first (oral) employment contract. If you’re not careful, you run the risk of an unwanted permanent employment contract arising! Read on to find out how to prevent this.

Trial day
It often happens that employers have a candidate do a trial day, or even just a few hours. Usually no agreements are made about this in advance. Only once the trial day has gone well is the first employment contract signed. That can cause problems, as the example below shows.

Example
A self-employed chef applies for a job at a restaurant. After the interview, the applicant is asked to help out in the kitchen for a few hours. He helps with dinner service and follows the chef’s instructions. It goes well for both sides. The hospitality entrepreneur and the applicant sign the first employment contract. The applicant starts employment as of 1 December. The three hours worked during the trial on 1 September are still paid out in the December payroll run.

After the first employment contract, two more fixed-term employment contracts are signed. So in total three fixed-term employment contracts have been signed, the hospitality entrepreneur thinks. That is still allowed.

The hospitality entrepreneur decides not to renew the third fixed-term employment contract and to part ways with the employee. The employee disagrees. He argues that he is by now employed on a permanent basis. According to him, those three hours of the trial day count as a first fixed-term (oral) employment contract. After that, three more fixed-term employment contracts were agreed. Four in total. That is one too many, and therefore his employment has automatically been converted to a permanent contract.

What does the court say in this situation?
The court then examines whether those 3 hours of the trial day constituted a first employment contract. The court checks three things, namely: (1) work, (2) authority, and (3) pay. The applicant took part in the work, so there is work. There is also authority: the applicant followed the chef’s instructions. The three hours of the trial day were also paid, so there is also pay. The fact that this was only paid three months later makes no difference.

This trial day (3 hours) therefore counts as the first employment contract. After that, three more fixed-term employment contracts were signed. That is one too many. That last fixed-term employment contract is therefore automatically converted into a permanent one. The employment contract therefore does not end on the agreed date: the employee remains employed and must continue to be paid!

How do you prevent this?
Of course you want to avoid being caught by surprise. It is certainly possible to hold a trial day safely. You could consider not paying wages, but only an expense allowance. Then the trial day probably does not qualify as an employment contract. Even better is to make use of the right (flexible) contracts. That limits your risk as much as possible and you know where you stand.

If you would like practical advice on this, contact us via our contact form or call 020-3450152.

Masterclass Working with flexible workers, 15 and 22 April 2021
Employers and clients can limit the financial and legal risks of flexible employees and self-employed contractors. We will teach you how during our online masterclass Working with flexible workers on 15 and 22 April 2021.
More information and registration

Would you like to be directly informed of relevant legal developments for SMEs from now on? Then sign up for our monthly Legal Alert newsletter and follow our company page on LinkedIn.

Nothing changes as constantly as laws and regulations. Please note that our blogs may no longer reflect current laws and regulations and may therefore be outdated. If you have questions or an issue relating to this blog, or wish to obtain legal assistance, please contact us.

De afgelopen jaren stonden in het teken van de Wet VBAR, het wetsvoorstel dat een einde moest maken aan onduidelijkheid over de zzp’er. Het kabinet heeft delen van dat voorstel inmiddels geschrapt. Op het eerste gezicht is dat goed nieuws: minder regels, minder administratieve last. Maar in de praktijk blijven dezelfde toetsen overeind.

“De inhoud van de samenwerking is leidend, niet wat er op papier staat.”

De Belastingdienst handhaaft sinds 1 januari 2025 weer actief op schijnzelfstandigheid. En recente uitspraken van de Hoge Raad bevestigen dat rechters strikt toetsen of er sprake is van ondergeschiktheid en gezagsverhouding.

Voor uw praktijk betekent dit drie dingen. Een: leg de samenwerking duidelijk vast, met aandacht voor de inhoud. Twee: voorkom dat een zzp’er feitelijk werkt als werknemer. Drie: wees voorbereid op een controle, en weet hoe u de relatie kunt herzien als dat moet.

Heeft u vragen over uw concrete situatie? Wij sparren dagelijks met opdrachtgevers over hun zzp-relaties. Vraag een offerte op of bekijk onze Legal Safe abonnementen.

Hella Vercammen LL.M.
Bente Brouwer LL.M.
Niels Terlouw LL.M.
Puck de Jong LL.M.

Read more